The cross of Christ stands at the very center of Christian theology, not as a symbol of divine wrath but as the ultimate revelation of God’s love and forgiveness. While some theological perspectives have interpreted the cross through the lens of retributive justice, this view is not borne out by a thorough reading of Scripture or the broader Christian tradition in my opinion. Instead, the cross reveals God’s refusal to meet humanity’s violence with violence, offering love and forgiveness in the face of rejection and rebellion. To understand the relationship between wrath, love, and the cross, we must consider both biblical texts and the insights of church fathers and modern theologians.
Wrath in Scripture: God Giving Us What We Choose
The biblical concept of wrath is often misunderstood. In Scripture, God’s wrath is not depicted as an emotional outburst or a desire for vengeance. Rather, it is described as God allowing humanity to experience the natural consequences of their choices. In Romans 1:18–32, Paul explains that “the wrath of God is being revealed” as God “gave them up” to the desires of their hearts. This “giving up” reflects God’s respect for human freedom — a profound and terrifying reality where God allows us to face the outcomes of living apart from His will.
N.T. Wright, in The Day the Revolution Began, emphasizes that God’s wrath is not arbitrary punishment but the intrinsic result of turning away from the source of life and love. Wright states, “The punishment for sin is not a special penalty, but the inevitability of what sin does — it dehumanizes us and distances us from God” (Wright, p. 126).
The Cross as the Revelation of Love and Forgiveness
Contrary to retributive interpretations, the cross is presented in Scripture as the ultimate act of self-giving love. In John 3:16, we read that “God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son,” and in Romans 5:8, Paul declares, “God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” These texts underscore that the cross is not about satisfying God’s anger but about God’s relentless pursuit of reconciliation with humanity.
The church fathers consistently emphasized the cross as a victory over sin and death rather than an appeasement of divine wrath. St. Athanasius, in On the Incarnation, explains that Christ took on human nature to heal it and restore it to communion with God. He writes, “The Word was made man so that we might be made divine” (Athanasius, ch. 54). This restorative vision of the cross is echoed by St. Gregory of Nyssa, who describes Christ’s death as a ransom paid not to God but to the powers of sin and death that held humanity captive.
The Wrath-Love Dichotomy: Misunderstandings in Theology
The penal substitutionary theory of atonement, which gained prominence during the Reformation, has contributed to the misunderstanding that the cross is about satisfying God’s wrath. While figures like John Calvin emphasized God’s justice, this perspective can obscure the central message of divine love. Jurgen Moltmann, in The Crucified God, critiques this view, arguing that it makes God complicit in violence. “The cross,” Moltmann writes, “is not about God’s demand for satisfaction but about God’s solidarity with the suffering of the world” (Moltmann, p. 204).
Similarly, C.S. Lewis, in Mere Christianity, rejects the notion of retributive justice as the essence of the cross. He writes, “We are told that Christ was killed for us, that His death has washed out our sins, and that by dying He disabled death itself. That is the formula. That is Christianity” (Lewis, Book 2, Ch. 4). For Lewis, the focus is on the transformative power of the cross, not on any retributive transaction.
Wrath as the Consequence of Separation, Not the Purpose of the Cross
If wrath is God allowing us to face the consequences of our separation from Him, the cross is God’s ultimate response to this separation. It is not about retribution but about reconciliation. As Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 5:19, “God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting people’s sins against them.” The cross confronts human sin not with wrath but with forgiveness, breaking the cycle of violence and opening the way to new life.
Fleming Rutledge, in The Crucifixion, captures this dynamic beautifully. She writes, “The wrath of God is not opposed to the love of God; it is the love of God in action against sin” (Rutledge, p. 211). God’s wrath, properly understood, is His refusal to let sin and death have the final word. The cross reveals that God’s love is stronger than human rebellion and that forgiveness, not retribution, is the heart of the Gospel.
Conclusion: The Cross as the Heart of God’s Love
The cross is not a demonstration of God’s wrath but the ultimate revelation of His love and forgiveness. While wrath reflects the consequences of human choices to live apart from God, the cross shows that God does not abandon us to those consequences. Instead, He enters into our brokenness, bearing the weight of sin and death to restore us to communion with Him.
This understanding challenges us to rethink theologies that emphasize retribution and punishment. The cross calls us to embrace a vision of God who is “compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness” (Exodus 34:6). It invites us to live in the freedom of forgiveness and to proclaim the Gospel as good news of reconciliation, not condemnation.
Footnotes and Resources
N.T. Wright, The Day the Revolution Began: Reconsidering the Meaning of Jesus’s Crucifixion (HarperOne, 2016).
St. Athanasius, On the Incarnation (trans. John Behr, St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011).
St. Gregory of Nyssa, The Great Catechism (Christian Classics Ethereal Library).
Jurgen Moltmann, The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology(Fortress Press, 1993).
C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (HarperOne, 2001).
Fleming Rutledge, The Crucifixion: Understanding the Death of Jesus Christ(Eerdmans, 2015).
Comments